One of my favorite songs is "The Climb," by Miley Cyrus. Not only does it have a great message, but I wanted to analyze it because it is about a topic that many of us can relate to.
Writtin in first person, this song implements logos, ethos, and pathos simply through its topic. The song is about life: its ups and downs, its trials and consequences, and its rewards and finishing goals. It talks about experiences that are detailed enough for everyone to understand, and general enough for everyone to relate to. I a specifically potent rhetorical technique used in this song is its emotional appeal. With perserverance a main subject implied in the words it talks about faith, an uphill battle, chances, and struggles. All of these are not necessarily meant to be percieved literally, rather, they concern emotions.
At the end of the song the music becomes more climatic as it crescendos. Another important thing it does is shifts narrative points of view and directs the lyrics straight at the listener. Drawing its audience into the music, the lyrics read "It's all about the climb, keep the faith, keep your faith."
P.S. Yes, I love this song. Don't judge me for being a Miley Cyrus fan... haha :)
Sunday, January 31, 2010
Memory
I chose Memory from Andrew Lloyd Webber's Cats. I really enjoy musicals and this song holds a lot of meaning. The meaning is far beyond what the words tell you. You can hear the sadness in her tone as she sings. She tugs at your heart strings. She mostly uses Pathos and Ethos. You can tell she knows exactly what she is taking about. She has been there. She still is. She is descriptive in a way only those who truly know can be.
The music is also very descriptive. It starts in low soft tones, as if barely breaching the subject. It waits for you to come aboard and it gently adds more instruments in as you are pulled farther into it. It builds then drifts backs, then in the last stanza it builds and you can feel the ferocity with which she feels. You are completely swept up in the emotion she is feeling, and you can't help feeling that way either.
The music is also very descriptive. It starts in low soft tones, as if barely breaching the subject. It waits for you to come aboard and it gently adds more instruments in as you are pulled farther into it. It builds then drifts backs, then in the last stanza it builds and you can feel the ferocity with which she feels. You are completely swept up in the emotion she is feeling, and you can't help feeling that way either.
The Minnow and the Trout
I found A Fine Frenzy's "The Minnow and the Trout" to be a good song for analysis. It relies heavily upon imagery and pathos to get its central meaning across, namely that people should all embrace each other despite of their differences. In fact, the song goes as far as to question whether there really exist any potent differences in the first place. The sweet diction and dreamy tone set the mood of the piece, giving a hint of the possible harmony the the singer is referring to.
A Fine Frenzy utilises a juxtaposition of objects that are seemingly at odds with one another, such as "trout" and "minnow", "elephant" and "rats", and the like. One group will speak to the other, pleading for assistance and tolerance, impressing the listener with the idea of cooperation in the face of differences. The idea is strengthened with the knowledge that the seemingly "stronger" party is also capable of initiating the bond, eliminating the assumption that such friendships are only a manner of the "weaker" party to gain an advantage; an eagle, a predatory bird, tells a dove "I'll fallen from my nest so high above/ Help me fly/ I am too afraid to try". A minnow beseeches a trout after it was "lost, and found/ Myself swimming in your mouth", evoking the listener's sympathy and raising the question of whether there is no way for the two to work together to achieve some sort of compromise. These small allegories thus are largely successful in presenting the overall theme of the song: unity, and overcoming differences.
The most potent use of pathos, however, lies in the chorus. The phrase "Please, I know that we're different/ [But] we were one cell in the sea in the beginning" appeals strongly to one's need for togetherness; humans are innately social creatures, and A Fine Frenzy works to speak directly to this primal need. The imagery that is utilised, namely that all things in the world come from the same basis and origin, is a powerful one in this sense. The call in "The Minnow and the Trout" is for people to start focusing on similarities instead of differences, and to remember that "...what we're made of was all the same once/[and that] we're not that different after all".
A Fine Frenzy utilises a juxtaposition of objects that are seemingly at odds with one another, such as "trout" and "minnow", "elephant" and "rats", and the like. One group will speak to the other, pleading for assistance and tolerance, impressing the listener with the idea of cooperation in the face of differences. The idea is strengthened with the knowledge that the seemingly "stronger" party is also capable of initiating the bond, eliminating the assumption that such friendships are only a manner of the "weaker" party to gain an advantage; an eagle, a predatory bird, tells a dove "I'll fallen from my nest so high above/ Help me fly/ I am too afraid to try". A minnow beseeches a trout after it was "lost, and found/ Myself swimming in your mouth", evoking the listener's sympathy and raising the question of whether there is no way for the two to work together to achieve some sort of compromise. These small allegories thus are largely successful in presenting the overall theme of the song: unity, and overcoming differences.
The most potent use of pathos, however, lies in the chorus. The phrase "Please, I know that we're different/ [But] we were one cell in the sea in the beginning" appeals strongly to one's need for togetherness; humans are innately social creatures, and A Fine Frenzy works to speak directly to this primal need. The imagery that is utilised, namely that all things in the world come from the same basis and origin, is a powerful one in this sense. The call in "The Minnow and the Trout" is for people to start focusing on similarities instead of differences, and to remember that "...what we're made of was all the same once/[and that] we're not that different after all".
Saturday, January 30, 2010
August Moon
Sara Bareilles' song "August Moon" is one of my favorite songs, not because of its musical simplicity but because of the lyrical simplicity that causes me to think. Her lyrics, not just in this song, tend to evoke a lot of emotion: they express perfectly how betrayal feels, how being something you're not feels, how some experiences feel magical, and how some relationships are painful while others only bring happiness. All these things she does with her simple and profound lyrics.
This song in particular is very pathetic. The lyrics are so clear about how she felt when she walked into a room to see someone she thought she loved with another girl. The emotion evoked by her lyrics is purely heart wrenching and causes me to reflect on similar situations I have had. I think that is what is so beautiful about her "writing", her ability to explain how she is feeling/how she felt through music and lyrics while also allowing her listeners to be able to relate/reflect on similar life experiences.
This song in particular is very pathetic. The lyrics are so clear about how she felt when she walked into a room to see someone she thought she loved with another girl. The emotion evoked by her lyrics is purely heart wrenching and causes me to reflect on similar situations I have had. I think that is what is so beautiful about her "writing", her ability to explain how she is feeling/how she felt through music and lyrics while also allowing her listeners to be able to relate/reflect on similar life experiences.
The Call
A song that I hold dear to myself is “The Call” by Regina Spektor. It about how the world you live in, the place that you once found comfort in, is changing all around you and how there is something that is pulling you away and out of the comforts of that world into somewhere different and frightening; a war. It represents the moments in our lives where we are called to leave the safety of our “homes” and go off to the “war” because we have to, not necessarily because we want to. But the song is naturally sad, but it leaves a hope that everything is going to be alright even though in the moment it is not.
This song is one that every person can relate to because there has been a time in everyone’s life where they had to leave something they love behind as they move forward with their lives. And Regina knows exactly how to hit everyone in her audience and apply pathos. The words that she uses are general and vague enough that they apply to everyone but yet the way that the words are portrayed give a sense that she is “speaking” exactly what you need to hear to soothe the pain. She acknowledges that there is pain a great loss and pain in the moments when “the call” carries you away off to “war,” but she also shows to the audience that the pain will pass and that even though you may be leaving a lot behind it does not mean that you can’t carry the memories with you. Regina knows the pain that the audience is experiencing, and does not deny the audience from the need to mourn out the pain. She allows for mourning, but then she knows how to comfort and to soothe the intensity of the pain.
Regina is able to apply pathos in a deep and inviting manner. She is able to reach deep with the person, and pull out emotions and pains that people may never knew existed otherwise. She pulls out all the pain of leaving and the pain of a changing life. But then she ribbons all the pain with a deep hope, a shaft to hold onto while you are being attacked by the storms of life. She reassures her audience that that there is “no need to say goodbye” because “you’ll come back/when its over.” You will survive the war.
The whole of the song is an extended metaphor. There is a call and there is a war. The call is your life continuing on its natural route. You cannot stop time and from your life continuing ever onward. The call the pull you feel when it is time to open the next door of your life and you must inevitably open that door, leaving behind a lot of people that you love. The war is the life that is ahead of you. Life is hard but you can get through it and survive and eventually return to those that you left behind.
This song is one that every person can relate to because there has been a time in everyone’s life where they had to leave something they love behind as they move forward with their lives. And Regina knows exactly how to hit everyone in her audience and apply pathos. The words that she uses are general and vague enough that they apply to everyone but yet the way that the words are portrayed give a sense that she is “speaking” exactly what you need to hear to soothe the pain. She acknowledges that there is pain a great loss and pain in the moments when “the call” carries you away off to “war,” but she also shows to the audience that the pain will pass and that even though you may be leaving a lot behind it does not mean that you can’t carry the memories with you. Regina knows the pain that the audience is experiencing, and does not deny the audience from the need to mourn out the pain. She allows for mourning, but then she knows how to comfort and to soothe the intensity of the pain.
Regina is able to apply pathos in a deep and inviting manner. She is able to reach deep with the person, and pull out emotions and pains that people may never knew existed otherwise. She pulls out all the pain of leaving and the pain of a changing life. But then she ribbons all the pain with a deep hope, a shaft to hold onto while you are being attacked by the storms of life. She reassures her audience that that there is “no need to say goodbye” because “you’ll come back/when its over.” You will survive the war.
The whole of the song is an extended metaphor. There is a call and there is a war. The call is your life continuing on its natural route. You cannot stop time and from your life continuing ever onward. The call the pull you feel when it is time to open the next door of your life and you must inevitably open that door, leaving behind a lot of people that you love. The war is the life that is ahead of you. Life is hard but you can get through it and survive and eventually return to those that you left behind.
Haven't Met You Yet
“Haven’t Met You Yet” is a song by Michael Bublѐ. The song is about a man who has never had a good relationship. He decides his past relationships haven’t worked because he just hasn’t met the right girl yet. Michael keeps on hoping that when the time is right she is just going to come into his life. He spends the song hopefully looking forward to the future and talking about what a great relationship they will have…if only he could meet her.
Michael Bublѐ uses ethos to establish his position of authority. Because Michael has been unsuccessful in matters of the heart multiple times, he has come to the conclusion that he just hasn’t met the right girl yet. Those who are listening to the song accept Michael’s authority because he’s been in love before and if it hasn’t worked out for him yet, he must know why.
The songwriter appeals to our emotions by talking about his past relationships. Michael claims, “I’ve broken my heart so many times, I’ve stopped keeping track.” Most of us have been in a few unsuccessful relationships, but he can’t even remember how many failed relationships he’s been in. From that opening line you would expect the rest of the song to be sad, but the rest of the song is surprisingly hopeful. He continues to say how patient he is going to be until she comes along, and how wonderful their lives will be together. His optimism influences others trying to recover from bad relationships because he is certain that “someday I know it’ll all work out.” Michael’s atypical approach to relationships gives all of us hope that if you haven’t had a good relationship yet, you just haven’t met the right person.
Michael uses logos to convince the listener that even if they’ve had numerous bad relationships in the past, someday they’ll meet the right person. After the failure of his past relationships, he has thought about the reason why none of them have worked. His logical conclusion is that he just hasn’t met her yet. Even though there could be many reasons why he hasn’t had a good relationship, he comes to the comforting solution that he just hasn’t met her, shifting the blame from himself to someone else. Even though it isn’t the best logical reasoning, he still convinces the audience to be hopeful that the right one will come along someday.
Michael Bublѐ uses ethos to establish his position of authority. Because Michael has been unsuccessful in matters of the heart multiple times, he has come to the conclusion that he just hasn’t met the right girl yet. Those who are listening to the song accept Michael’s authority because he’s been in love before and if it hasn’t worked out for him yet, he must know why.
The songwriter appeals to our emotions by talking about his past relationships. Michael claims, “I’ve broken my heart so many times, I’ve stopped keeping track.” Most of us have been in a few unsuccessful relationships, but he can’t even remember how many failed relationships he’s been in. From that opening line you would expect the rest of the song to be sad, but the rest of the song is surprisingly hopeful. He continues to say how patient he is going to be until she comes along, and how wonderful their lives will be together. His optimism influences others trying to recover from bad relationships because he is certain that “someday I know it’ll all work out.” Michael’s atypical approach to relationships gives all of us hope that if you haven’t had a good relationship yet, you just haven’t met the right person.
Michael uses logos to convince the listener that even if they’ve had numerous bad relationships in the past, someday they’ll meet the right person. After the failure of his past relationships, he has thought about the reason why none of them have worked. His logical conclusion is that he just hasn’t met her yet. Even though there could be many reasons why he hasn’t had a good relationship, he comes to the comforting solution that he just hasn’t met her, shifting the blame from himself to someone else. Even though it isn’t the best logical reasoning, he still convinces the audience to be hopeful that the right one will come along someday.
Monday, January 25, 2010
Control?
Here is my sentence that I have rearranged 7 times:
You can never tell the consequences when you release all of your control.
1. When you release all of your control, you can never tell the consequences.
2. The idea that you control your own life by taking drugs, which in turn relinquishes all of the "control" you originally possessed, is a faulty at best, because you will never know the consequences until it is too late.
3. Why take the risk of losing control, because you will inevitably have to face the consequences.
4. All actions have consequences and when you don't control the actions the unknown consequences just get worse.
5. Consequences are results of action, and no control of actions now is equal to no control of consequences later.
6. Control yourself and you will control your consequences, but if you don't control yourself you will never know the consequences until it is too late.
7. Please try and remember that every time you give up control, you lose yourself to the consequences that follow.
You can never tell the consequences when you release all of your control.
1. When you release all of your control, you can never tell the consequences.
2. The idea that you control your own life by taking drugs, which in turn relinquishes all of the "control" you originally possessed, is a faulty at best, because you will never know the consequences until it is too late.
3. Why take the risk of losing control, because you will inevitably have to face the consequences.
4. All actions have consequences and when you don't control the actions the unknown consequences just get worse.
5. Consequences are results of action, and no control of actions now is equal to no control of consequences later.
6. Control yourself and you will control your consequences, but if you don't control yourself you will never know the consequences until it is too late.
7. Please try and remember that every time you give up control, you lose yourself to the consequences that follow.
Friday, January 22, 2010
Same Sentence, Different Words
I am warm.
It is blasted hot!
My sweater is too warm.
The temperature is really high.
Why is it so hot?
It is hot.
I wish there was a breeze.
Someone should turn on the air conditioner.
It is blasted hot!
My sweater is too warm.
The temperature is really high.
Why is it so hot?
It is hot.
I wish there was a breeze.
Someone should turn on the air conditioner.
Future, now gone
The main sentence is: We are affecting the future by murdering human beings.
1. What will the consequences be from the death of these unborn babies?
2.These human beings future now completley destroyed.
3. Who's friend, wife, mother, grandma was just killed by abortion?
4. that unborn child's future was already decided without its own consent.
5. The possible potential of this human being destrowed in seconds by abortion.
6. Abortion is not even giving them an opportunity to have a future.
7.Which abortion just killed the future leader, scientist, author or inventor?
1. What will the consequences be from the death of these unborn babies?
2.These human beings future now completley destroyed.
3. Who's friend, wife, mother, grandma was just killed by abortion?
4. that unborn child's future was already decided without its own consent.
5. The possible potential of this human being destrowed in seconds by abortion.
6. Abortion is not even giving them an opportunity to have a future.
7.Which abortion just killed the future leader, scientist, author or inventor?
The Argument
Original: The Argument seems to go on forever.
1. This argument is taking a long time.
2. This disagreement seems to be eternal.
3. I might be dead before we agree.
4. In the beginning was…. "The Argument".
5. This disagreement is ongoing.
6. This disagreement might finally be over by the time Christ comes.
7. Will this argument ever end?
Eight Ways of Hate
1. He was angry.
2. He was consumed with a fiery rage.
3. The man was furious.
4. His eyes glowed with hatred.
5. He had that smile now, that smile that let you know he was no longer pleased.
6. His soul had been warped and mutated by hate, like a Ziploc bag in the microwave.
7. His hot temper boiled up like acid, eating through any positive feelings that had once been between them.
8. Angry, he was.
Spanking
Original sentence: Why does a parent spank a child?
1.) How many times must a man spank a child, before you can call him a man?
2.) Parents-what is the infatuation with spanking?
3.) Mommy? Daddy? Why do you spank me?
4.) I cannot fathom why any parent would willing lay a hand on their child to punish them.
5.) Spanking is an act of abuse; why do parents do it?
6.) “Happiness in family life is most likely to be achieved when founded upon the teachings of the Lord Jesus Christ”-would Jesus Christ spank a child?
7.) How can any loving parent feel they are justified in spanking a child?
1.) How many times must a man spank a child, before you can call him a man?
2.) Parents-what is the infatuation with spanking?
3.) Mommy? Daddy? Why do you spank me?
4.) I cannot fathom why any parent would willing lay a hand on their child to punish them.
5.) Spanking is an act of abuse; why do parents do it?
6.) “Happiness in family life is most likely to be achieved when founded upon the teachings of the Lord Jesus Christ”-would Jesus Christ spank a child?
7.) How can any loving parent feel they are justified in spanking a child?
An experiment in perspectives.
Jake crashed his skateboard into a nearby tree.
My poor baby had an awful accident on that "skate board" of his today!
I gave a piece of my mind to a whippersnapper that was being a little too friendly with Grand Old Wilson this morning.
Subject A-7683i proceeded to roll upon his skating device into a tall, sugar-synthesizing, carbon-based tower to perform a religious ritual.
Like, today?, like, that weirdo Jake, right? was riding his skateboard?, and he, like, totally gave me a look and then, like, crashed into a tree.
The tree was so appalled by the defilement of his boardy brother that he jumped out in front of the skating young man and bashed him in the head.
Carlos just promised his ant-brother that they would both make it safely to the farm in the tree when the ever-looming, ever-dangerous shadow appeared on the doorstep and sealed their doom to an even shorter, more pathetic, yet entirely more painful, ant-life.
Duuuuude, total wipeout!
Thursday, January 21, 2010
Sentence Variations
Abortion; and it's no accident.
- Abortion-it's no accident.
- Abortion is not an accident.
- Abortion is a deliberate act.
- That abortion wasn't an accident.
- It's no accident: abortion.
- Abortion is no accident!
- Abortion...it's not an accident.
Jesus is Pretty Cool
Original: I think Jesus is a pretty cool guy.
1. Jesus sure is a remarkable fellow.
2. Nice man, that Jesus chap.
3. I say, Christ sure is rather charming.
4. A marvelous man, that Jesus is!
5. Alas, I doth protest that Christ does embody perfection, quite.
6. I rather like that Savior of ours.
7. Jesus seems to me to be quite a likeable chum.
This was a bit flippant, I'm aware, but I was persuaded to use it. =]
1. Jesus sure is a remarkable fellow.
2. Nice man, that Jesus chap.
3. I say, Christ sure is rather charming.
4. A marvelous man, that Jesus is!
5. Alas, I doth protest that Christ does embody perfection, quite.
6. I rather like that Savior of ours.
7. Jesus seems to me to be quite a likeable chum.
This was a bit flippant, I'm aware, but I was persuaded to use it. =]
The Seven Sentences
Original sentence: Rise and shout the Cougars are out.
1. Ascend and bellow for the mascot of the school.
2. Yippee skippy our team is playing!
3. Get on your feet and scream for the team.
4. If you are a fan, you should yell now.
5. Cheer on the team to victory.
6. Will cheer for Cosmo.
7. Watch out, here come the Puma concolors.
Wow…this turned out to be a whole lot harder than I thought.
1. Ascend and bellow for the mascot of the school.
2. Yippee skippy our team is playing!
3. Get on your feet and scream for the team.
4. If you are a fan, you should yell now.
5. Cheer on the team to victory.
6. Will cheer for Cosmo.
7. Watch out, here come the Puma concolors.
Wow…this turned out to be a whole lot harder than I thought.
Lost Love
My heart is broken.
An empty cavity fills my chest.
Jagged edges cut through my heart.
I feel no love.
My vital organ is shattered.
Love seeps through the cracks in my heart.
Passion has died with the absence you left.
Unfixable wounds pain my heart.
Stylish Sentences - :)
My older sister, Carrie, attended Brigham Young University.
1. Carrie attended BYU.
2. Brigham Young University was haunted by my sister's presence.
3. Carrie graduated from BYU.
4. The University of Brigham Young once held Carrie.
5. Carrie is a BYU alumni.
6. My older sister has escaped with a BYU diploma.
7. Carrie moseyed along through college.
P.S. Personally, sentence 2 is my favorite.
1. Carrie attended BYU.
2. Brigham Young University was haunted by my sister's presence.
3. Carrie graduated from BYU.
4. The University of Brigham Young once held Carrie.
5. Carrie is a BYU alumni.
6. My older sister has escaped with a BYU diploma.
7. Carrie moseyed along through college.
P.S. Personally, sentence 2 is my favorite.
Sleep Deprivation
Original Sentence:
I am tired.
1. Sleep, my dear friend, where art thou?
2. I have not slipped into unconsciousness in a while.
3. I am exhausted.
4. I feel deprived of that which brings me rest.
5. I am but a hollow shell without that deep relaxation called sleep.
6. What is that thing called sleep?
7. Numbness creeps in to fell the void created by sleep deprivation.
I am tired.
1. Sleep, my dear friend, where art thou?
2. I have not slipped into unconsciousness in a while.
3. I am exhausted.
4. I feel deprived of that which brings me rest.
5. I am but a hollow shell without that deep relaxation called sleep.
6. What is that thing called sleep?
7. Numbness creeps in to fell the void created by sleep deprivation.
Wednesday, January 20, 2010
Don't y'all know it's hot outside?
Original: It was hot outside.
1. It was a burning hot day.
2. Zounds, 'twas hot!
3. The air was thick with heat.
4. The heat enveloped him, like opening an oven door.
5. Waves of heat bloomed up from the pavement.
6. The sun was suffocatingly close; it burned her lungs and cracked her lips.
7. It was a still, sweltering day.
1. It was a burning hot day.
2. Zounds, 'twas hot!
3. The air was thick with heat.
4. The heat enveloped him, like opening an oven door.
5. Waves of heat bloomed up from the pavement.
6. The sun was suffocatingly close; it burned her lungs and cracked her lips.
7. It was a still, sweltering day.
Sentence Style
Original: What happened to childhood?
- Where did the sun in the child's eyes go?
- Where did the sound of play run off to?
- When did all the children die?
- Are children even children anymore?
- What happened to being a kid?
- Children, here? I see none.
- I see families, young and old, but no children.
Patriot Games
Well haha its been about 3 years sense I have picked up a book to read other than the scriptures... So its been a while, but a book that really stood out to me in my mind of really good writing is "Patriot Games" by Tom Clancy. Personally anything written by Tom Clancy is amazing writing to me! In his Novel of Patriot Games, he has a amazing way of making you feel like you are right there and that you are apart of the story. I had a really hard time putting this book down because I found myself feeling some of the same emotions the main character, Jack Ryan was feeling. It may sound weird but I was desperately wanting his family to be safe! and all I wanted was for Sean Miller, the Vengeful Irish terrorist to be put away and stopped! Some of the Styles he uses well are being concise yet with great clarity and detail. He also was great at voice, hence why I felt a closeness to Jack Ryan, and a hatred for Sean Miller. Over all a GREAT book and excellent style.
"Excuse me, Jack, tell me one thing in life that is absolutely for certain... (his response).... My daughter's love."
Spindle's End
So my favorite book may sound somewhat cheezy, considering that it is a fairy tale. It's called Spindle's End by Robin McKinley, and it has been my favorite since the seventh grade. This book is a retelling of the Sleeping Beauty story, execpt with the whole story. The book goes through and tells the rest of "Rosie's" life and actually brings her to be a person. In the end she has a head on her shoulders and doesn't just follow the prince away blindly. It's still sweet and fun to read, however, it just lets you into her life to be able to become part of the story. I don't actually have the book with me to get quotes from, but the descriptions in the book are amazing. The author does such a good job at describing everything without going into overkill. Its the kind of book I like to read on a warm vacation when I'm being lazy. Just one of the feel good ones!
"The Things They Carried"
“The Things They Carried” by Tim O’Brien is, to me, an example of good writing. I read this book during high school my senior year and the messages and ideas in it have stayed with me until this day. This book centers on a company in the Vietnam War and describes various events in their experience that taught them various truths. O’Brien is very vivid, and sometimes very graphic, in his description of the environment, both physical and emotional. The book talks about the things that the soldiers carried, from everyday equipment to emotional scars and baggage that influence the way that they view the war, the world, and each other. One of the things that helped me understand this book more came after a very graphic description of the war. At the end, O’Brien casually states that the story never happened, but it didn’t mean it wasn’t true. As I read that I realized that this book was really trying to teach a lesson and show how individuals cope with trying circumstances. I feel that this is a good book because it does try to teach, it allows the reader to connect with the characters and most importantly because it forces you to think inwardly and discover what you are carrying and what it does to you.
“They carried the soldier’s greatest fear, which was the fear of blushing. Men killed, and died, because they were embarrassed not to. It was what had brought them to the war in the first place, nothing positive, no dreams of glory or honor, just to avoid the blush of dishonor. They died so as not to die of embarrassment.”
“They carried the soldier’s greatest fear, which was the fear of blushing. Men killed, and died, because they were embarrassed not to. It was what had brought them to the war in the first place, nothing positive, no dreams of glory or honor, just to avoid the blush of dishonor. They died so as not to die of embarrassment.”
Tuesday, January 19, 2010
Does Parenting Really Matter?
Being in a parenting and child rearing class now we have really discused if parents matter or not. It made me think back to an article I read last semester in my Human Development class called Does Parenting Really Matter? written by Laura E. Berk. It is a good article because it startes off saying why people don't think parents matter. For those parents who have kids that just went off the deep in its a nice excuse for them becuase parents don't matter. But then it goes on telling of research done showing that parents do matter. She says, "The idea that in a long-standing relation such as one between parent and child, the child would be influencing the parent but the parent would not be influencing the child is absurd." Berk goes on telling of different researches proving that parents matter and it is not the same experiment over and over again but she gives different kinds of experiments. She sums up saying, "parenting effects combine in complex ways with many other factors, including heredity and peers." After she states that she gives the audience four recommendations to ensure the best outcomes for one's children. So I think she ends it well also, she gives all this proof for how parents matter and then says how to help.
Alamut
I have recently finished reading, and have thoroughly enjoyed, a book called Alamut by Vladimir Bartol. Because it is a translated work, I cannot praise the diction or even the flow of the writing, which most likely have been altered significantly. Instead, what strikes me as the most commendable aspect of this novel is the amount of intimate detail given to things such as the political and individual actions in respect to the description of the characters' thoughts and feelings. Usually, such a manner of presentation would quickly bore most readers, yet Bartol manages to do something unique and extremely rare; he skillfully exposes emotion and a character's inner conflicts without relying on loquacious detail. Although the overall portrayal of the story is told in a tone that can only be described as one of reason, Bartol offers his readers glimpses of the emotional aspects in subtle actions: a misspoken word, an involuntary body movement, always something small and, on the character's part, left incomplete. Yet, these subtleties manage to be the most poignant and revealing parts of the plot. Because Bartol tends to avoid the excessively detailed prose known of most first time novelists, the reader is given what can be seen as a bird's eye view of Alamut's world: although three main characters are named and followed, there is no narrative presence playing verdict, no defending or attacking of any character's actions or lifestyle. The reader will likely find his sympathies shifting, finding flaws in the “heroes” and the noble in the “villians”. It is a tumultuous, hazy, endearingly realistic read. What I find to my liking is that this is an author who is not in love with his own voice; he never strews about excessive paragraphs filled with similes and imagery, does not rely on them or their like to tell the story for him, does not interject within the narrative to guide the reader's understanding. He also avoids the other extreme, that being blandness, by always revealing just enough, giving the reader exactly what they need to piece together the puzzle of their own making.
"Listen to me, boy. The supreme principle of the Ismailis is this: Nothing is true, everything is permitted.” - By revealing the supreme Ismaili motto, it is as though Bathol is inconspicuously handing his readers the key to understanding his work. To find the central meaning of the novel, the reader must see through the “delusion” of ordinary actions and dialogue, and see what he or she might not have thought possible before.
"Ibn Tahir fell back onto the floor. His heart ached bitterly. Yes, he was still in love with her.” - Barthol demonstrates here the poignancy of reductionism. Here the reader is suddenly and unceremoniously jolted with the reality that Avani ibn Tahir still loves the woman he had been hating and cursing for the past several chapters. The sentences are short, to the point, and lack any flowery words or adornments. Yet in relation to the preceding text, this quote provides all the emotion needed. In fact, it almost does seem as if the clipped tone and the blatancy are what make the quote so profound.
"It would be good to die now, he thought. Just one firm decision to throw himself over the battlements, and everything would be over. But God knows where he would awaken after that.” - The grand “mastermind” Hasan ibn Sabbah, the one who seemed omnipotent and remorseless in his plans, is suddenly exposed to be internally agonised and self-loathing. Barthol does not execute this revelation of his character's emotions through a drawn out description of feelings, a beautifully formulated history of ibn Sabbah's life story, nor anything of the like. The reader is given three sentences, a short glimpse into ibn Sabbah's secret musings. The moment is short and relatively plain. Yet everything that needs to be known is there for the reaping.
"Listen to me, boy. The supreme principle of the Ismailis is this: Nothing is true, everything is permitted.” - By revealing the supreme Ismaili motto, it is as though Bathol is inconspicuously handing his readers the key to understanding his work. To find the central meaning of the novel, the reader must see through the “delusion” of ordinary actions and dialogue, and see what he or she might not have thought possible before.
"Ibn Tahir fell back onto the floor. His heart ached bitterly. Yes, he was still in love with her.” - Barthol demonstrates here the poignancy of reductionism. Here the reader is suddenly and unceremoniously jolted with the reality that Avani ibn Tahir still loves the woman he had been hating and cursing for the past several chapters. The sentences are short, to the point, and lack any flowery words or adornments. Yet in relation to the preceding text, this quote provides all the emotion needed. In fact, it almost does seem as if the clipped tone and the blatancy are what make the quote so profound.
"It would be good to die now, he thought. Just one firm decision to throw himself over the battlements, and everything would be over. But God knows where he would awaken after that.” - The grand “mastermind” Hasan ibn Sabbah, the one who seemed omnipotent and remorseless in his plans, is suddenly exposed to be internally agonised and self-loathing. Barthol does not execute this revelation of his character's emotions through a drawn out description of feelings, a beautifully formulated history of ibn Sabbah's life story, nor anything of the like. The reader is given three sentences, a short glimpse into ibn Sabbah's secret musings. The moment is short and relatively plain. Yet everything that needs to be known is there for the reaping.
Pride and Prejudice style
I love reading, as I am sure most girls are, Jane Austen novels. I love the descriptions and language she uses. Her sentences are never phrased in a boring or regular way; they have character themselves. One of her books that I particularly love is Pride and Prejudice, and no matter how good the movie is it will never replace what I feel when reading the story. Austen sets the story from line one by giving little insights into the minds of the characters. She phrases her sentences from the beginning in exactly the same manner in which a given character in her story would. An example would be: "It is a truth universally acknowledged, that a single man in possession of a good fortune, must be in want of a wife. However little known the feelings or views of such a man may be on his first entering a neighbourhood, this truth is so well fixed in the minds of the surrounding families, that he is considered the rightful property of some one or other of their daughters"(Austen). This, in my opinion,is a great example exactly what Mrs. Bennett is thinking throughout the novel. This idea is carried onto every page. It is used openly in the book. It is good writing, because it entices you to read more. You really care about the characters, because they are so well developed, you can relate to them and they are present in every aspect of the writing.
Forest Born
I admire the writer who can create a character unlike any other, and have their readers relate. Shannon Hale is this writer. Hale is the author of "The Books of Bayern." There are four books in this series, so far, anyway. I've read all four of the books, but the latest one published has been my favorite, Forest Born. Something I admire about this text is that the plot is completely unique--the author has designed a world like our's, but with crazy twists that would seem insane in our world. With her story she has imagined characters with completely unique attributes, with problems and trials that no one could ever really experience. The awesome part is that as a reader I could relate with her characters. I could perfectly picture their experiences and sympathize/empathize (I can never remember the difference, someone help me out here) with them. She descibes everything so perfectly, and somehow connects you with her intriguing book. This is what sucks me into the pages, and I couldn't put the book down. I know it sounds silly, but I grew attached to her characters and I was so emotionally tied to them while reading. Forest Born makes me tear up, makes me sigh with relief, and makes me laugh with delight. Thank you, Shannon Hale.
"No tree nearby to cling to, so instead she sank into herself as if into a tree's thoughts. But her eyes were open, she was still Rin, still aware. As she had done on her walk to the cage, Rin felt as if she existed in two places at onece--safe inside the green world of a tree's thoughts, but still aware and moving in the human world. And this time panic did not eat at her. She felt perfectly balanced, half in, half out, and alive in both. Everthing seeemed slowed, like a drip of sap fixed by cold weather."
"It was like being lost in the rings of an ancient tree, how she seemed to be falling and yet warm and still and as secure as could be. There was no fear, no wincing away from herself."
"No tree nearby to cling to, so instead she sank into herself as if into a tree's thoughts. But her eyes were open, she was still Rin, still aware. As she had done on her walk to the cage, Rin felt as if she existed in two places at onece--safe inside the green world of a tree's thoughts, but still aware and moving in the human world. And this time panic did not eat at her. She felt perfectly balanced, half in, half out, and alive in both. Everthing seeemed slowed, like a drip of sap fixed by cold weather."
"It was like being lost in the rings of an ancient tree, how she seemed to be falling and yet warm and still and as secure as could be. There was no fear, no wincing away from herself."
Nicholas Nickleby
Nicholas Nickleby is a novel written by Charles Dickens and is one of my favorites. It is the story of Nicholas Nickleby who father has just died and he is forced to provide for his family in a wicked world and at the same time keep up his values. His uncle is a man obsessed with money that does everything in his power to hurt Nicholas for some perceived wrongs. Dickens is a master of personifying characters as something more than themselves.
“Are you threatening now to tell others of whatever you learned when you were my clerk? To be plain with you, Mr. Brooker, the world already knows what sort of man I am. And I do not grow poorer. You cannot stain a black coat.”
“Nearer and nearer draws the time that shall surely be when the earth shall be filled with the glory of god as the waters cover the see. Ring on. For the births that lead to early deaths, for marriages made in hell, and for the coming in of every year that brings this cursed world closer to its end. Would that it had come before tonight.”
“The family need not be defined merely as those with whom you share blood, but those for whom you would give your blood."
Simply Human
When I was sophomore, I had the privilege to read a book that reached the top of my favorite books and has continued to stay there. It even influenced me to name my dog after the main character, Scout. This book taught me valuable lessons about mankind and the worth of any man’s life. As Atticus Finch said, “You never really understand a person until you consider things from his point of view—until you climb inside of his skin and walk around in it.” It taught me to think from other points of view. This and many important lessons were taught through Harper Lee’s words as she brought up the issues of prejudice and racism in To Kill a Mockingbird. This book taught me that no matter what color your skin is, you are still human and deserve the right to live. Harper Lee’s word’s also taught me the power one example can make. “It took an eight-year-old child to bring ‘em to their senses… that proves something- that a gang of wild animals can be stopped, simply because they’re still human. Hmp, maybe we need a police force of children.” Scout’s example stopped a mob from doing something they would most likely regret later. This book taught me that I can be that example. I can be the one to stand up for another, to cause a change, maybe even to save a life. Harper Lee made it seem simple to do what is right.
The Most Dangerous Game
The piece of literature I chose is the short story "The Most Dangerous Game" by Richard Connell. I think this story is really great in a lot of ways. First of all I love the suspense and the signs of foreshadowing. Having reread it and knowing what to expect it was interesting to see where predictions could have been made. I think it really gets you thinking about people's value and brings the issue of hunting to a different perspective. I enjoy the author's detailed descriptions and the imagery that it portrays.
"'We will have some capital hunting, you and I,' said the general. 'I shall be most glad to have your society'" is interesting to read knowing what the outcome of the story is. I'm not sure, but I think the author maye have been using this to foreshadow or show the irony of the plot.
"For a moment the general did not reply; he was smiling his curious red-lipped smile. Then he said slowly, 'No. You are wrong, sir. The Cape buffalo is not the most dangerous big game.' He sipped his wine. 'Here in my preserve on this island,' he said in the same slow tone, 'I hunt more dangerous game.'" I like the moments like this in the story where you start imagining and predicting what is going to happen and there is such a mysterious setting. I love it when you can start to see what is happening and then watch as the main character starts to understand the situation. It is a disturbing story in some ways, but i think it is exciting, intense, and fun to read also.
"'We will have some capital hunting, you and I,' said the general. 'I shall be most glad to have your society'" is interesting to read knowing what the outcome of the story is. I'm not sure, but I think the author maye have been using this to foreshadow or show the irony of the plot.
"For a moment the general did not reply; he was smiling his curious red-lipped smile. Then he said slowly, 'No. You are wrong, sir. The Cape buffalo is not the most dangerous big game.' He sipped his wine. 'Here in my preserve on this island,' he said in the same slow tone, 'I hunt more dangerous game.'" I like the moments like this in the story where you start imagining and predicting what is going to happen and there is such a mysterious setting. I love it when you can start to see what is happening and then watch as the main character starts to understand the situation. It is a disturbing story in some ways, but i think it is exciting, intense, and fun to read also.
Thus Spake Zarathustra
"Thus Spake Zarathustra", by Friedrich Nietzche, is an example of excellent writing. Nietzche puts his own philosophy and poetry into the mouth of the Persian philosopher Zarathustra, as he wanders a fictional countryside, considering what he sees and attempting to impart wisdom to the people he meets.
While Nietzche fulminates against the 'slave morality' of Christianity and declares that "God is dead", it is clear that the main thrust of his anger is aimed at aspects of Christianity (so-called) that most Mormons would also reject and regard as apostate. The worthwhile aspects of his philosophy are beautifully conveyed, and I suspect that he speaks through a "prophet" so that he can be unafraid of lofty and poetic language.
"Companions, the creator seeks; not corpses, not herds and believers. Fellow creators, the creator seeks -- those who write new values on new tablets. Companions, the creator seeks, and fellow harvesters; for everything about him is ripe for the harvest."
"Intoxicating joy is it for the sufferer to look away from his suffering and forget himself."
"What is great in man is that he is a bridge and not a goal: what is lovable in man is that he is an over-going and a down-going."
While Nietzche fulminates against the 'slave morality' of Christianity and declares that "God is dead", it is clear that the main thrust of his anger is aimed at aspects of Christianity (so-called) that most Mormons would also reject and regard as apostate. The worthwhile aspects of his philosophy are beautifully conveyed, and I suspect that he speaks through a "prophet" so that he can be unafraid of lofty and poetic language.
"Companions, the creator seeks; not corpses, not herds and believers. Fellow creators, the creator seeks -- those who write new values on new tablets. Companions, the creator seeks, and fellow harvesters; for everything about him is ripe for the harvest."
"Intoxicating joy is it for the sufferer to look away from his suffering and forget himself."
"What is great in man is that he is a bridge and not a goal: what is lovable in man is that he is an over-going and a down-going."
Quirkiness
So, one of my favorite things to do is reader my older sister's blog. She is such a great writer, in my opinion, and loves to write (as she is a news producer in Oregon). I always go to her blog when I want to read or be inspired about life and be motivated to keep going. This particular post is titled "Quirk, Quirk, Quirk it Out..." and is all about her quirks, all the things that make her who she is. I believe that because she is so open, honest and clear about her life and herself in general, the writing is beautiful. It's raw and emotional. To me, that is some of the most amazing and effective writing.
Favorite Lines:
"The older I get the more I think Little Women may be my favorite book. It's certainly not the most intellectual book I've ever read, nor the one that stretched my thoughts of the world the most -- but it is among the most honest and sincere things I've ever read. I love it. I can read it over and over again and not get tired of it. And no matter how many times I read it, or what your debate for the ending is ... I always have/do/will believe that Jo should have ended up with Laurie."
Favorite Lines:
"The older I get the more I think Little Women may be my favorite book. It's certainly not the most intellectual book I've ever read, nor the one that stretched my thoughts of the world the most -- but it is among the most honest and sincere things I've ever read. I love it. I can read it over and over again and not get tired of it. And no matter how many times I read it, or what your debate for the ending is ... I always have/do/will believe that Jo should have ended up with Laurie."
A Short History of Nearly Everything
Bill Bryson has truly written a science book for the masses. His writing in A Short History of Nearly Everything covers almost every scientific discovery that could be relevant to the lives of a common man. As a music major, I'm not completely familiar with science, but Mr. Bryson's style is gripping and has left me with no choice but to continue reading. His book reads like a pleasant and intriguing conversation rich with deep historical and scientific facts with an occasional dash of wit. Here's an excerpt that really enlightened me to the significance of my existence:
"Consider the fact that for 3.8 billion years, a period of time older than the Earth's mountains and rivers and oceans, every one of your forebears on both sides has been attractive enough to find a mate, healthy enough to reproduce, and sufficiently blessed by fate and circumstance to live long enough to do so. Not one of your pertinent ancestors was squashed, devoured, drowned, starved, stranded, stuck fast, ultimately wounded, or otherwise deflected from its life's quest of delivering a tiny charge of genetic material to the right partner at the right moment in order to perpetuate the only possible sequence of hereditary combinations that could result--eventually, astoundingly, and all too briefly--in you."
To me this book is an exemplary example of audience-directed writing.
Monday, January 18, 2010
Ender's Game
One of my all time favorite books is Ender's Game by Orson Scott Card. His character development and plot line are deep and beautiful and elegant. As you watch these character's live out their lives, you begin to form an attachment to them. You find yourself caring about these people. You hurt when they are hurt, sad when they are sad, and you are constantly hoping that they will make it through and be all right. The only real way that I can explain the complexity of Ender's Games is to compare it to an onion. There is always another layer after you pull back one layer; always something for anyone to get out of the book. No matter who you are or where you come from, anyone can "get" something out of it. Learn something about themselves or others or how the world works. The thoughts and ideas that are represented in Ender's Game range from simple to complex, from deep to shallow, from philosphical to logical, and everywhere in between. In makes you think about life and your part in it. You are exposed to both extremes of the nature of mankind; the evil and the good and everywhere in between. For these very reasons it is hard to put the book down but at the same time you feel inclined to set it down for a while so that you can sort out your thoughts on what you just read.
In the end this book moves you in ways you never thought you could be moved (well at least it was that way for me).
"In the moment when I truly understand my enemy, understand him well enough to defeat him, then in that very moment I also love him. I think it's impossible to really understand somebody, what they want, what they believe, and not love them the way they love themselves." - Ender (Orson Scott Card)
In the end this book moves you in ways you never thought you could be moved (well at least it was that way for me).
"In the moment when I truly understand my enemy, understand him well enough to defeat him, then in that very moment I also love him. I think it's impossible to really understand somebody, what they want, what they believe, and not love them the way they love themselves." - Ender (Orson Scott Card)
Catching Fire
The most recent novel that I have read is Catching Fire by Suzanne Collins. It is the second book in the Hunger Games trilogy, a relatively new young adult series that I was introduced to in my Children’s Literature class last semester. I love this book because it is riveting. I have never been so enthralled by a piece of literature as I am with this book. Every chapter has a twist at the end and I would often find myself skipping to the end of the chapter just to see what happens. I literally could not put this book down. The book is about a future dystopia, in which the main characters inadvertently start a revolution that changes the fate of world. I enjoy this book because it contains the elements of many different genres of literature including romance, science fiction and suspense. One of my favorite parts of the book comes at the very end (don’t worry, this won’t ruin the ending for anyone), when Katniss, one of the main characters, realizes what she means to the revolution.
“’We had to save you because you’re the mockingjay, Katniss,” says Plutarch. “While you live, the revolution lives.” The bird, the pin, the song, the berries, the watch, the cracker, the dress that burst into flames. I am the mockingjay. The one that survived despite the Capitol’s plans. The symbol of the rebellion.” (Collins, p.386-387).
“’We had to save you because you’re the mockingjay, Katniss,” says Plutarch. “While you live, the revolution lives.” The bird, the pin, the song, the berries, the watch, the cracker, the dress that burst into flames. I am the mockingjay. The one that survived despite the Capitol’s plans. The symbol of the rebellion.” (Collins, p.386-387).
Wednesday, January 13, 2010
College Football Champion?
In most professional sports the best team is determined through a tournament or playoffs that match the best teams up and eventually whittle them down until only one remains; the champion. College football has never followed this formula and has opted instead to rely on polls, computers, and now the Bowl Championship Series. Since its inception, the BCS has often resulted in controversy and argument over who really is the National Champion. Many claim that this system is unfair to most teams, and the majority of conferences. Even the United States Congress has become involved to try and solve this problem.
The audience I wish to address this issue to is the BCS committee but still appealing to college football fans in general. The committee is the group that ultimately makes the decisions about who can be involved with the BCS bowls and crowning the “champion” so I feel that an appeal to them could potentially have the greatest effect. My relationship to the audience is as a fan of college football who feels the current system is ineffective and unequal. A few genres that would work to address them would be through an open letter to all college football fans, letters specifically to them, and blog posts about the issue.
The audience I wish to address this issue to is the BCS committee but still appealing to college football fans in general. The committee is the group that ultimately makes the decisions about who can be involved with the BCS bowls and crowning the “champion” so I feel that an appeal to them could potentially have the greatest effect. My relationship to the audience is as a fan of college football who feels the current system is ineffective and unequal. A few genres that would work to address them would be through an open letter to all college football fans, letters specifically to them, and blog posts about the issue.
Obamas Health care plan
An issue I wish to address is that of Obamas Health care plan, which is a issue that seems to be very debatable and one I feel strongly about. My stand is on the side of opposition to his plan. I feel that the more we move to socialized anything the more "less american" we become. There is a reason we have such great quality of health care in america compared to the rest of the world, there is a reason doctors are willing to go through 12+ years of schooling, going into massive debt and working and studying harder that most other professions. There is a reason they want to be the best at what they do, and thats competition. If we were to socialize our health care we would have health care much like Canada and Australia, and where do the citizens of Canada come when they need Quality health care. When a kid needs a serious surgery... the USA! Because the doctors have to be good in order to do well in there profession. If there not, no one will go to them.
Also there comes the issue of paying for this Health care plan. The claim is made by Obama that taxes will not be raised. But he never explains how that is to be. What will happen is hard working people will have a raise to there taxes sometimes paying for the health care of people who don't even work (by choice) and spend there money on things that end up getting them in the hospital; Drugs, Alcohol, etc.
My audience I will be addressing will mainly be the whole american people, specifically those who can vote and are supporters of Obamas health care plan. And also those who are in positions of political attention and persuasion. My relation to them is that I'm just a american citizen like them. Genres I might use to reach them is YouTube clips showing the quality of health care of Canada and other socialized health care countries compared to that of Americas, also Articles in Magazines and news papers. Also use the addiction of America... Facebook.
Tuesday, January 12, 2010
Lack of Human Contact
One issue I might like to address is the dissociation of humans in the modern world. This has bothered me since my days in middle school when everyone started to get cell phones and laptop computers. Many of the youth my age stopped calling one another and speaking to one another face-to-face and started to text one another and simply instant message or email one another. It seems to have further affected people because even here, in my BYU community, I have noticed this (especially in my classes and my social circle). People no longer ask for notes from people in person or study together, rather they send mass emails to their classmates and send notes and study guides around online. I believe that this needs to be changed, and I hope that this can change now.
My audience would be the youth of today, maybe more specifically the youth of my home ward. Having seen and experienced the awfully ridiculous behaviors myself and finding it rather horrible that people can no longer connect on the same level, I would be able to show the youth that I understand the current social mores. I would like to address them via a letter or some kind of discussion so that I can be involved and really drive my point to the youth.
My audience would be the youth of today, maybe more specifically the youth of my home ward. Having seen and experienced the awfully ridiculous behaviors myself and finding it rather horrible that people can no longer connect on the same level, I would be able to show the youth that I understand the current social mores. I would like to address them via a letter or some kind of discussion so that I can be involved and really drive my point to the youth.
Small Town Fun
An issue that I might discuss would be the lack of recreational opportunities in some small towns. Growing up in a small town myself, I have seen the problems "having nothing better to do" can cause amoung youth in the community. Some towns have a Parks and Recreation department, which is a good start, but most of those end when children get to middle school. Once youth don't have an opportunity to enjoy themselves they look for something else to do. I'm not saying that it needs to be sports exactly, but some sort of activity organization. I believe this would also help bring communities together, both as youth and as adults.
My audience would be specifically city council members, as well as the community as a whole. By coming from a small town I would be able to relate to their thoughts more and have some of the same priorities. I could reach my audience by writing a letter to the editor, having posters, fundraisers (if necessary), and participating in city council meetings when the public is invited to do so.
My audience would be specifically city council members, as well as the community as a whole. By coming from a small town I would be able to relate to their thoughts more and have some of the same priorities. I could reach my audience by writing a letter to the editor, having posters, fundraisers (if necessary), and participating in city council meetings when the public is invited to do so.
Should Old People Really Be Allowed to Drive?
I've decided that issue over allowing old people allowed to drive is something that America needs to decide. Some believe that a set age needs to be the cut off for driving while other believe that it is everyone's right and freedom to drive as long as they want. I believe that the current drivers license allowances are too relaxed. People need to be tested more to make sure they are still capable of driving safely. Especially old people, medical reports show that as you age your body and brain aren't as sharp as they use to be. We need to make sure are roads are safe. My main genre is the media. And to raise awareness of the issue, advertisements such as commercials and bill boards are effective. My audience will be to the adults of America.
Save a life who doesn't have a say.
My issue is on abortion and how it needs to become illegal. There would be two exceptions though, those exceptions being if the pregnancy is the result of rape or if the mother’s life is endangered by the pregnancy. Almost every third baby conceived in America is killed by abortion, that is not right! This baby does not even have a say and it is murder that we are legally allowing. There is health complications linked to abortions, over 100! Some states are even helping pay for abortions. I think we need to reinforce the value of life again in the United States. My audience is to those who support abortion in the United States. Genres that I would use are the media. I could put it in the new papers, Facebook, bill boards. There are so many ways that I could get to people and I would really try to use their emotions and use statistics to get to them.
A D- in Religion?
An issue I would like to address: religion classes at Brigham Young University. Though BYU is an LDS University, not all of its students are Latter-Day-Saints. As a religious school, it has every right to require religion classes. The issue lies with the grading system along with the difficulty of some of the religion classes. Not all religion teachers grade the same; many grade leniently and many grade harshly. However, it is not necessary to make religion classes have a point grading system. Rather, it would be more effective to have a pass-fail grading system. There are two types of classifications for religion teachers at BYU. A few have the attitude of wanting to enrich their students’ lives; they want their students to learn and strengthen testimonies. But many times BYU’s religion teachers feel they need to be competitive. With required religion classes being worth at least two credits, teachers feel they have to make their class strenuous and unrealistically challenging. Though the religion teachers claim that any non-LDS student has just as much chance to get an A in their class as a regular LDS student, this is certainly not always the case. Most other universities have their religion classes graded with a pass-fail system. I feel it would also be effective for BYU to grade their religion classes pass-fail. If some students want to study religion for their major, then it can be their choice to take higher level and more difficult religion classes worth graded credit. However, for the majority of BYU students in other majors, it would be more appropriate for a pass-fail system, when it comes to religion classes.
The audience I want to address is the students, the school faculty, and the school administration. I feel that there is strength in numbers, so the more people I can influence; the more likely I am to make a difference. As I am a student that is required to take the religion classes, just like all the other students at BYU, I feel I can relate to many in the BYU community. Different genres I could use would be a letter to the Daily Universe or a letter to the administration. Also, to seek the support of the student body I could use face-book to spread awareness on the situation and how to act upon it.
The audience I want to address is the students, the school faculty, and the school administration. I feel that there is strength in numbers, so the more people I can influence; the more likely I am to make a difference. As I am a student that is required to take the religion classes, just like all the other students at BYU, I feel I can relate to many in the BYU community. Different genres I could use would be a letter to the Daily Universe or a letter to the administration. Also, to seek the support of the student body I could use face-book to spread awareness on the situation and how to act upon it.
The Issue of Abortion
An issue that I think would be a good topic to address is abortion. This topic is one that is definitely of controversy and can be argued. Specifically I would like to take the stand that abortion is wrong unless the health of the mother is at stake or the conception was due to rape. I do not think that it is okay when it is the result of something the mother chose to do. For this issue I would direct it toward the audience of those who agree with the practice of abortion. One genre I would use would be the value of the individual. I realize that some would say that the mother has rights and use this against me, but I would like to focus on how the mother made a choice and that the child does not get a say when abortion is used. What about the infant's value? I think that another genre I could use in my persuading would be equality and opportunism. Even though this might not be the way people usually use this genre I believe I could once again fight for the unborn child and it's opportunities.
Perception As a Hindrance
There are times when reading into things proves beneficial. The act of "reading between lines" is used in everyday conversation in the most casual of times. However, it can be argued that utilising this to extreme degrees can be inopportune, even harmful to one's emotional harmony. Unfortunately, today's world seems to be one in which everyone is on guard, expecting unseen attacks from all sides and paranoid about encountering it. Even worse is the fact that we as human beings are disinclined to leave a perceived threat as is - many arguments and subsequent falling outs are a consequence of the would-be victim and the indignant would-be attacker. The recently released movie "Avatar" is meant to be a source of entertainment with a lingering eco-friendly theme, yet a quick search on the web will reveal different reactions ranging from claims that the film is supporting racism, paganism, and in some cases even causing depression and suicidal thoughts (http://edition.cnn.com/2010/SHOWBIZ/Movies/01/11/avatar.movie.blues/index.html). The latter in particular emphasises the point that purposely seeking out the possible (and I stress the word "possible) negative aspects in something with a benign surface can oft times lead to more bad than good.
The audience that this issue concerns the most would probably be almost all adults and teenagers; smaller children typically being too young to concern themselves with subtleties. With this in mind, the genre of an argumentative approach should probably try to appeal to the intelligence of these age groups; thoughtful blogs online and Letters to the Editor in a newspaper coming foremost to mind.
The audience that this issue concerns the most would probably be almost all adults and teenagers; smaller children typically being too young to concern themselves with subtleties. With this in mind, the genre of an argumentative approach should probably try to appeal to the intelligence of these age groups; thoughtful blogs online and Letters to the Editor in a newspaper coming foremost to mind.
Kids Growing up too Fast
The possible issue I could use:
This world of technology and media, more and more often you will see a little kid with a cell phone texting away or a ten year old girl trying to dress like an adult, with the low cut tight jeans and pedicured/manicured nails, and hair done up in an adult style. The media and technology are everywhere you go. You can't escape it unless you choose to decide to go to some remote location. Kids in elementray school do not need to get a cell and be texting their friends. They should be outside talking and playing with one another. Even in middle school and beginning high school they don't need one. The only reason I can think of why a young person would need a cell phone would be if they had a car and/or a job. Kids are loosing the ability of how to have a real converstation face to face becuase instead they are texting away or chatting on MySpace or Facebook. Also, more and more the ideals of the media are being thrust down the thrust, almost willingly, of children. It doesn't help the kids are watching more and more television and being sucked into the unrealistic realistc world of the media. Young girls are convinced that in order to be like or loved they most match the definition of beauty that the media portrays. Again, we are seeing kids in elementary school in boyfriend-girlfriend relationships. They don't need that but it is happening everywhere; they shouldn't even think about getting a boy/girlfriend until they are in high school at least. I also here of stories of little children in kingergarten classes getting the "sex talk." That "talk" we wouldn't get until 5th or 6th grade. Also we see that we are putting children into more activities and groups and sports to the point they hardly have time for anything; there is no down time. As a society we are indirectly and directly forcing or children to grow up faster and faster and in return stealing away precious years of childhood. Having a childhood and being able to play as a child is an important time for growing up and we are talking that away.
The audience:
The main audience I would like to be able to direct this too is towards parents and pre-teen/middle school kids (about ages 8-13). A lot of what kids do and act is through they way their parents raise them. If I can raise the awarness of this issue to parents and have them understand what is happening then maybe parents could find a way to improve the way they are raising their children. If I could somehow get the idea into the hormonally filled head of a teenager then mayber I could influence them to slow down their lives and realize the things they may have now is something that don't really need.
Genres:
Some ways that I could get to the audience would be through the use of new media such as Facebook or Myspace groups or pages, or find blogs that parents use and could see. Using one sentence liners would be affective for the younger ages and using more small paragraphs for the parents. We could also bring the issue straight into the classrooms of young students, like they do for anti-drug usage. Short ads on tv would works as well (like they do for anti-drug usage). The list goes on and on.
This world of technology and media, more and more often you will see a little kid with a cell phone texting away or a ten year old girl trying to dress like an adult, with the low cut tight jeans and pedicured/manicured nails, and hair done up in an adult style. The media and technology are everywhere you go. You can't escape it unless you choose to decide to go to some remote location. Kids in elementray school do not need to get a cell and be texting their friends. They should be outside talking and playing with one another. Even in middle school and beginning high school they don't need one. The only reason I can think of why a young person would need a cell phone would be if they had a car and/or a job. Kids are loosing the ability of how to have a real converstation face to face becuase instead they are texting away or chatting on MySpace or Facebook. Also, more and more the ideals of the media are being thrust down the thrust, almost willingly, of children. It doesn't help the kids are watching more and more television and being sucked into the unrealistic realistc world of the media. Young girls are convinced that in order to be like or loved they most match the definition of beauty that the media portrays. Again, we are seeing kids in elementary school in boyfriend-girlfriend relationships. They don't need that but it is happening everywhere; they shouldn't even think about getting a boy/girlfriend until they are in high school at least. I also here of stories of little children in kingergarten classes getting the "sex talk." That "talk" we wouldn't get until 5th or 6th grade. Also we see that we are putting children into more activities and groups and sports to the point they hardly have time for anything; there is no down time. As a society we are indirectly and directly forcing or children to grow up faster and faster and in return stealing away precious years of childhood. Having a childhood and being able to play as a child is an important time for growing up and we are talking that away.
The audience:
The main audience I would like to be able to direct this too is towards parents and pre-teen/middle school kids (about ages 8-13). A lot of what kids do and act is through they way their parents raise them. If I can raise the awarness of this issue to parents and have them understand what is happening then maybe parents could find a way to improve the way they are raising their children. If I could somehow get the idea into the hormonally filled head of a teenager then mayber I could influence them to slow down their lives and realize the things they may have now is something that don't really need.
Genres:
Some ways that I could get to the audience would be through the use of new media such as Facebook or Myspace groups or pages, or find blogs that parents use and could see. Using one sentence liners would be affective for the younger ages and using more small paragraphs for the parents. We could also bring the issue straight into the classrooms of young students, like they do for anti-drug usage. Short ads on tv would works as well (like they do for anti-drug usage). The list goes on and on.
Gay Marriage
With the new trial challenging Proposition 8 in California, the issue of gay marriage is back in the news. Like abortion or gun control, it is a complex, emotional issue that tends to generate vigorous opinions.
Supporters of gay marriage declare that marriage (however broadly defined) is a universal human right that should be available to same-sex couples. They argue that sexual orientation is an innate human characteristic, and is thus entitled to the same civil protections under law as gender, race, national origin, etc. By drawing comparison to the civil rights movement, proponents of gay marriage declare themselves to be "on the right side of history", as the culmination of a long struggle for equality under law.
Those who oppose same-sex marriage do so with various arguments, some of which are stronger than others. Some consider homosexual behavior to be immoral in itself, and refuse to recognize relationships they deem sinful. Some believe that gay marriage would dilute or distort the very definition of the word "marriage", and tamper with an institution that forms the bedrock of civil society. Others are concerned that legitimizing gay marriage would require public schools to discuss families more inclusively, and teach children that homosexual relationships are as valid and "normal" as heterosexual relationships.
The audience is universal; anyone living in the United States will be affected, at least symbolically, by the upcoming court ruling. Either marriage law will remain a matter for the States to decide for themselves, or State governments will be forced to recognize gay marriages.
Supporters of gay marriage owe a large part of their persuasive success to the way they have framed the debate as a question of liberty, equality, and individual rights--principles that are sacred to most Americans. Any attempt to counter these arguments must consider those same values, addressing the liberty and individual rights of parents to determine what their children are taught in school, or the freedom of religious organizations to solemnize marriages in accordance with their beliefs. Of particular worth is an appeal to democracy--Americans oppose gay marriage by a considerable majority, and gay marriage proponents have turned to legal action because they have failed to earn broad democratic support.
The debate is awash with slogans and one-liners; in heated discussions like these, they are of little persuasive value (although they may mobilize the already-persuaded). My goal would be to clarify the reasons why I oppose gay marriage--since I view much of the anti-gay-marriage rhetoric to be as silly and inconsistent as the pro-gay-marriage rhetoric. It is a complex issue that deserves a complex discussion. With that end in mind, I would use essay format, posting in blogs or op/ed pieces for news websites.
Supporters of gay marriage declare that marriage (however broadly defined) is a universal human right that should be available to same-sex couples. They argue that sexual orientation is an innate human characteristic, and is thus entitled to the same civil protections under law as gender, race, national origin, etc. By drawing comparison to the civil rights movement, proponents of gay marriage declare themselves to be "on the right side of history", as the culmination of a long struggle for equality under law.
Those who oppose same-sex marriage do so with various arguments, some of which are stronger than others. Some consider homosexual behavior to be immoral in itself, and refuse to recognize relationships they deem sinful. Some believe that gay marriage would dilute or distort the very definition of the word "marriage", and tamper with an institution that forms the bedrock of civil society. Others are concerned that legitimizing gay marriage would require public schools to discuss families more inclusively, and teach children that homosexual relationships are as valid and "normal" as heterosexual relationships.
The audience is universal; anyone living in the United States will be affected, at least symbolically, by the upcoming court ruling. Either marriage law will remain a matter for the States to decide for themselves, or State governments will be forced to recognize gay marriages.
Supporters of gay marriage owe a large part of their persuasive success to the way they have framed the debate as a question of liberty, equality, and individual rights--principles that are sacred to most Americans. Any attempt to counter these arguments must consider those same values, addressing the liberty and individual rights of parents to determine what their children are taught in school, or the freedom of religious organizations to solemnize marriages in accordance with their beliefs. Of particular worth is an appeal to democracy--Americans oppose gay marriage by a considerable majority, and gay marriage proponents have turned to legal action because they have failed to earn broad democratic support.
The debate is awash with slogans and one-liners; in heated discussions like these, they are of little persuasive value (although they may mobilize the already-persuaded). My goal would be to clarify the reasons why I oppose gay marriage--since I view much of the anti-gay-marriage rhetoric to be as silly and inconsistent as the pro-gay-marriage rhetoric. It is a complex issue that deserves a complex discussion. With that end in mind, I would use essay format, posting in blogs or op/ed pieces for news websites.
Alternative Energy
I've spent a lot of time researching whether or not the government should mandate the use of alternative energy for transportation.
Those in favor cite global warming and the environment and push for alternative fuel sources to reduce emissions. They also say that oil makes us dependent on other countries, and is a limited resource.
Those against alternative energies claim that the alternative energies available are not nearly advanced enough to replace oil entirely and that any pollution reduced from emissions is only transfered to another place. Switching to electric cars will only cause coal plants to emit just as much pollution (if not more) as what was saved. There are also a few who say the environment is a non-issue.
The audience is complicated. There are consumers who wish to have the product that will save them the most money, and may have an inkling thought about the environment. Then, there are producers who wish to make the most money possible. (Oil companies purging every last dollar, or car companies exploiting trends.)
It's hard to talk to the companies; they have one tracked minds. My audience would be the consumers. The population is also the ultimate decision maker, so appealing to the voting body would get me the best results.
If I wanted to push for mandated alternative energy, I would talk mostly about the importance of energy independence. I'd demonize OPEC and deals they make with car companies and reveal how much control oil producing countries can possibly exert over our nation (cite prior gas shortages, etc.) Until greater technologies emerge, the environmental angle may be touching, but in the long run illogical because mandated alternative energies do not benefit the environment at this point in time.
If I was apposed, I would exploit the inefficiencies of every possible alternative and glorify our current system.
Atheism is a Religion
From Christ being taken out of Christmas to the attempts to delete “under god” from the pledge of allegiance there seems to be a removal of religion from public life. Some want to stop from teaching creation in schools and there are attempts to remove funding from schools with a religious affiliation. In fact, if one was to look at this objectively they would see that governmental influence is turning increasingly atheist, or at least agnostic. All in the name of “separating church and state”. Their views and opinions seem to take precedence solely because they are of a nonreligious affiliation. There is a double standard that favors those who consider themselves godless. I see a simple solution to this. Classify atheism as a religion. Because essentially the belief in no god is just that, a belief. Since the constitution forbids the favoring of one religion over another the system will not be skewed in favor of those without one. Governments will have to respect every religion equally and no one will be above this.
The audience is anyone that is affected by the religious debate. But I can imagine that atheists themselves would not be very open to this idea. As a man of religion I would have to prove to audience the universal benefits of this argument so as to not appear favoring religion. Rather I would need to make the impression of equality under the law for all of people regardless if they accept deity or not. The genres of the arguments are presented in the preivous paragraph.
The Cost of Being a Fan
BYU has always had a unique environment, full of “peculiar people”. And in most things, our “in the world but not of the world” attitude has served us well. But there is one issue in which I think BYU would be wise to follow the crowd. The issue that I have with BYU is the price of sporting events, or rather that there is any price tag attached to our cougar pride at all. I would like to express my opinion to the Athletics department at BYU because I feel like they are the most likely to be make a change in the cost of sporting events. My relationship to the Athletic department is not very direct, but as a student who attends athletic events, my opinion is important. Throughout my exploration of this topic, I would like to learn where the revenue from ticket sales goes. If revenue is a necessary money maker that goes to support the athletes, is there any other way those funds can be raised? What are the reasons behind keeping student ticket prices as they are? Why haven’t we followed the example of other universities and eliminated the cost for students to attend athletic events? By addressing this topic, I would like to learn the reasons behind our current system and if possible, how to make a change. I would be able to reach my audience through genres such as a letter to the head of the Athletics department or an editorial comment in the Daily Universe. I would also be able to raise awareness on this issue through the use of new media such as BYU sports fan groups on facebook and student blogs. I would also use catchy one-liners and puns such as: Help us enrich our college experience by eliminating the cost of sporting events (lame, I know but I couldn’t resist).
Monday, January 11, 2010
Google and Censorship
Many currently believe that Google Inc. is one of the most technologically advanced and culturally spreading companies and search engines available today. However, according to this news article Google is a depriving the public of good media. Apparently Google is filtering the culturally degrading and possibly upsetting media from certain countries while allowing others to still gain access to such material. Google most likely does this to filter the types of results that could be brought up for simple searches of harmless words and the offensiveness of some of the results in other cases. Such censorship can actually be thought of as helpful and harmless when one really thinks about the good of others.
"Don't Panic."
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/01/10/AR2010011002143.html
In his most recent article, "Don't Panic", Newsweek editor Fareed Zakaria suggests that an emotional, heavy-handed reaction to the attempted airline bombing last month may be unwarranted, and may in fact be exactly the sort of response the attack was intended to provoke. Certainly this suggestion runs counter to the impulses of most readers (as well as policymakers) and is therefore an "unacceptable proposition."
He cites the unique nature of terrorism as an instrument of effecting change. The real physical damage of a terrorist attack is not important; what matters is the psychological impact. If it did not trigger fear and anger, it would not be effective. Zakaria suggests that Al-Qaeda claimed responsibility for the botched attack because, although it failed to claim any lives, it still elicited the desire response.
He interprets the attack as an ill-conceived potshot at the US, that indicates Al-Qaeda's inability to mount more effective, large-scale attacks. He argues that to further stifle air travel with security procedures of dubious efficacy would not make the nation safer, and would only serve to dignify a rather desperate and amateurish attack.
In his most recent article, "Don't Panic", Newsweek editor Fareed Zakaria suggests that an emotional, heavy-handed reaction to the attempted airline bombing last month may be unwarranted, and may in fact be exactly the sort of response the attack was intended to provoke. Certainly this suggestion runs counter to the impulses of most readers (as well as policymakers) and is therefore an "unacceptable proposition."
He cites the unique nature of terrorism as an instrument of effecting change. The real physical damage of a terrorist attack is not important; what matters is the psychological impact. If it did not trigger fear and anger, it would not be effective. Zakaria suggests that Al-Qaeda claimed responsibility for the botched attack because, although it failed to claim any lives, it still elicited the desire response.
He interprets the attack as an ill-conceived potshot at the US, that indicates Al-Qaeda's inability to mount more effective, large-scale attacks. He argues that to further stifle air travel with security procedures of dubious efficacy would not make the nation safer, and would only serve to dignify a rather desperate and amateurish attack.
rhetorical situation
So, if you didn't guess my topic is drug abuse. Drugs are not only harmful to yourself, but they intern are dangerous for those around them. I mean it really hurts the abusers too, they pull teeth out, scratch skin off, jump off buildings, have braincell loss, and an addiction which leads to crimes such as stealing for money and the next high. It just has a ripple effect. Starting in the drug users own circles, it hurts their families, friends, classmates. It hurts the families, because it alters moods and causes the abusers to do really stupid things and they shirk responsibilities within the home, causing strained relationships. The friends, because no matter how many cool friends do it with them, they are still setting a horrid example. The classmates, everyone knows who abuses the drugs, in a high stupor the abusers could potentially harm their classmates by driving them around, or involving them in their crimes. They don't even have to know the people they hurt, the person they hit while driving, or beat up because they thought that they were a crazy colored pinata. The biggest issue that I find with drug abuse, is drug abusers with children. They are hurting their children. I have seen poor little crack babies, heard horror stories about mothers boiling their children's feet...it goes on. Life is only about their next fix. Nothing else.
The audiences to address would probably be the drug abusers themselves or the age just under the age most kids start abusing. 12ish maybe? You can maybe influence the abuser to realize that life isn't really that bad and do the same for the young kids. Just curbing what causes people to run to drugs is a big help in their life. I feel like this issue is relevant to all people, everyone knows an abuser.
The genres to reach the audience could potentially be short stories, allegorical stories, poems, songs...there are lots of ways to reach people.
The audiences to address would probably be the drug abusers themselves or the age just under the age most kids start abusing. 12ish maybe? You can maybe influence the abuser to realize that life isn't really that bad and do the same for the young kids. Just curbing what causes people to run to drugs is a big help in their life. I feel like this issue is relevant to all people, everyone knows an abuser.
The genres to reach the audience could potentially be short stories, allegorical stories, poems, songs...there are lots of ways to reach people.
More sex is safer sex
Now you cant really find a more unacceptable title then this one. And I totally do not agree with what he is saying. But I don't have to, I just have to find something that is an initially Unacceptable claim and this fits the bill. http://www.ft.com/cms/s/2/76faa124-f0f0-11db-838b-000b5df10621.html This is a book by steven Landburg that tries to apply the art of economics to Sexual promiscuity. In there he states that if more people were promiscuous then sex would be safer for everyone. Even though this appears ridiculous he makes the argument that if more people where sexually active then there would be not be a small circle of people with STD's, rather a larger circle of generally "clean" people and therefore everyone would be less likely to get an STD. He makes the argument that sexual restraint is a pollution to those more promiscious. if one was to agree with his dogmatic logic they may come around to his way of thinking and find his initially unacceatable claim to be accetable. But I doubt it.
Raise the legal driving age for teens?
An issue that comes up every now and then is one of if the legal driving age for teens should be raised. Here is a article written by Karl Chisholm; http://www.blueoregon.com/2009/10/raise-the-legal-driving-age-for-teens.html.
His claim is that we need to raise the legal driving age from what it is now. It seemed that the general population that responded did not agree primarily those who are parents of teen drivers.
In his reasonings he gives some statistics that "the rate of crashes, fatal and nonfatal, per mile driven for 16-year-old drivers is almost 10 times the rate for drivers ages 30 to 59" and that traffic accidents are the leading killer of american teens. I like how on the subject for his reasons he didn't just give negative reasons but that he gave some of the positive benefits that would come from raising the age. although some of them were more assuming than more facts. none the less it at least made me think about those things such as traffic and the assumption that the teenagers would increase there cardiovascular activities more. Over all I felt that he did give some good reasons, and specifically at the beginning of his article, he presented his reasons and assumptions well, but for some reason on his last paragraph he seemed to lose some of my trust. he seemed to be very one sided and I feel he didn't think much about what his audience that will have differing opinions claimed. Example as I read I was often saying in my mind "But what about....." He should have read read Writing and Rhetoric haha :)
Stem Cell Research
An issue with much ethical controversy is the topic of stem cell research. In an article by Janet Rowley, http://www.usnews.com/articles/opinion/2009/03/23/embryonic-stem-cell-research-does-too-much-good-to-be-evil-says-janet-rowley.html, the claim is made that stem cell research does too much good to be a bad thing. This claim is quite unacceptable to people because of the issues with using embryos to do the research.
To support her claim she uses the logical reasoning that the embryonic cells, from in vitro fertilization, will basically just be thrown away if not used. Also she tells of how scientists have been very willing to work with the restrictions put on them and have tried to use alternative methods, so it is not as if they are only doing that which people might not agree with. They are doing it to benefit others, so it is not for 'evil' intentions. Yet stem cells offer so much and research has not found a better source to help so many people. Through using these statements the author is giving reasons to the audience that make sense and is being accurate in her research on what is happening in the labs.
To support her claim she uses the logical reasoning that the embryonic cells, from in vitro fertilization, will basically just be thrown away if not used. Also she tells of how scientists have been very willing to work with the restrictions put on them and have tried to use alternative methods, so it is not as if they are only doing that which people might not agree with. They are doing it to benefit others, so it is not for 'evil' intentions. Yet stem cells offer so much and research has not found a better source to help so many people. Through using these statements the author is giving reasons to the audience that make sense and is being accurate in her research on what is happening in the labs.
Abortion
At the site http://www.leaderu.com/orgs/probe/docs/arg-abor.html Kerby Anderson is making a claim on how Abortion is bad in all different aspects of life. This is definitely an initially unacceptable claim. Although I agree with his claim there are many who do not at all. We can see that in the amount of abortions we have each year. Just in U.S. since 1973, when it became legal, there have been approximately 46 million abortions. Kerby Anderson’s claim is not accepted by all Americans. He starts off using the bible as an argument against abortion. He uses a couple of areas in Psalms, he uses a lot of different scriptures throughout the bible. As he ends he really focuses on a legal code in Exodus concerning a prematurely birth due to a man hitting a women, if this happens that man will die. He concludes that a baby inside the womb has the same legal status as a baby outside the womb and so that it is unlawful to kill a baby inside the womb. For those who do not believe in the Bible he goes on to use medical arguments against Abortion. Some of the main points were the definition of death. One definition is the cessation of heartbeat. So if that means death, than does the start of a heartbeat mean life which starts the 18th day in the womb. He continues the argument by going to legal arguments against abortion. He says that since the Supreme Court does not know how to define when life begins they should have acted “as if” life was in the womb, since they did not know. But they didn’t and ended up overturning state laws that protected the fetus. Lastly he uses philosophical arguments. He gives some of the definitions people have for life or human beings. But if we followed those then we could have an infanticide. Throughout his argument he tries to reach all types of people, Christians, Doctors, and those in law.
Should Old People Be Allowed to Drive?
A classic debate is whether or not old people should be allowed to drive. This author is passionately against old people driving. Follow this link: http://www.squidoo.com/oldpeopleshouldnotdrive
He claims that at the age of seventy-four or older the crash rates are too high. But he also points out that the crash rates are just as high as anyone under twenty-four. Therefore if anyone over seventy-four year olds shouldn't be able than shouldn't anyone under twenty-four also not be able to drive? The internet is used more by young adults and if they are reading this, they are not going to want to get their driving privlidges taken away. His claims are then backed by a few random statistics, some stories of crashes the elderly have gotten into and some funny videos at the bottom the site. I'm sure their are plenty of statistics, stories and videos about the dumb accidents younger people have had. Nobody's perfect and I agree that everyone should be tested regularly to make sure they are capable of getting behind the wheel. But his discrimination towards old people overall is a weak claim.
Sunday, January 10, 2010
Coloured lasers treat epilepsy?
A January, 2010, BBC health-related article claims that coloured lasers can be used to treat brain disorders, such as epilepsy. Apparently, the Massachusetts Institute of Technology has discovered a way to use yellow and blue flashing lasers to shut down brain activity.
Here is the link to the artile: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/8441983.stm
The claim is initially unacceptable because lasers and epilepsy does not seem a common connection, nor a feasible one. The reader automatically questions, "what do colorful lights have anything to do with brain disorders?," and, "how can lasers cure seizures?" The answer to these questions is obviously not self-explanatory, and this is what begins the argument.
The article goes on to give details of the study and how and why it works. The author is giving reasons for the reader to believe the claim. The study revolves around two genes that need light to make energy. They are called Arch and Mach. Arch and Mac contain the genetic code for light-activated proteins. MIT has engineered brain neurons to express Arch and Mach. In testing they were able to control the brains of animals with yellow and blue lasers because the light activates proteins that lower the voltage in the neurons and stops them from generating an electrical signal. The researchers are working on targeting specific parts of the brain to shut down, eliminating seizures.
The author uses scientific facts and studies that show experiment outcomes to back up his claim. By the end of the article, a clear assumption is made that yellow and blue flashing lasers may one day cure brain disorders.
-Lydia Nelson
Here is the link to the artile: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/8441983.stm
The claim is initially unacceptable because lasers and epilepsy does not seem a common connection, nor a feasible one. The reader automatically questions, "what do colorful lights have anything to do with brain disorders?," and, "how can lasers cure seizures?" The answer to these questions is obviously not self-explanatory, and this is what begins the argument.
The article goes on to give details of the study and how and why it works. The author is giving reasons for the reader to believe the claim. The study revolves around two genes that need light to make energy. They are called Arch and Mach. Arch and Mac contain the genetic code for light-activated proteins. MIT has engineered brain neurons to express Arch and Mach. In testing they were able to control the brains of animals with yellow and blue lasers because the light activates proteins that lower the voltage in the neurons and stops them from generating an electrical signal. The researchers are working on targeting specific parts of the brain to shut down, eliminating seizures.
The author uses scientific facts and studies that show experiment outcomes to back up his claim. By the end of the article, a clear assumption is made that yellow and blue flashing lasers may one day cure brain disorders.
-Lydia Nelson
Correcting Myths about Job Interviews
One of the news stories on the Yahoo! homepage is about myths or job interviews and why they are myths. One myth in particular says "Do not show weakness in an interview." This claim seems unacceptable because, when in an interview, you think you should always be trying to put you best foot forward. Revealing a weakness to a potential employer seems like a backward step in the interview process.
The authors of the article use expert opinions to prove to the reader that this statement really is a myth. They talked with workers for companies that help people find and keep jobs, to see what to really do during an interview. One of the things that they said to prove their point about the myth is that if you are asked about a weakness and you talk your way around it in such a manner that you don't answer the question, the interview can see right through it and know that you are not being honest with them. A potential employer is more likely to hire someone with a flaw, but is honest, than someone who pretends that they are perfect. The experts give the advice that, if asked, you should give one true flaw or weakness that you have. Make sure to also include how you are able to work through this disadvantage or how you deal with it in a positive way. Once you have done this, allow the interviewer to move on to something different, and don't dwell on the subject any longer.
By the end of the article you, as a reader, are able to see where the authors of the article are coming from. You may not agree, but fromt their reasoning you now find yourself thinking about their statement and more open to their ideas.
The article can be found at:
http://hotjobs.yahoo.com/career-articles-interview_myths_that_keep_you_from_landing_the_job-1026
The authors of the article use expert opinions to prove to the reader that this statement really is a myth. They talked with workers for companies that help people find and keep jobs, to see what to really do during an interview. One of the things that they said to prove their point about the myth is that if you are asked about a weakness and you talk your way around it in such a manner that you don't answer the question, the interview can see right through it and know that you are not being honest with them. A potential employer is more likely to hire someone with a flaw, but is honest, than someone who pretends that they are perfect. The experts give the advice that, if asked, you should give one true flaw or weakness that you have. Make sure to also include how you are able to work through this disadvantage or how you deal with it in a positive way. Once you have done this, allow the interviewer to move on to something different, and don't dwell on the subject any longer.
By the end of the article you, as a reader, are able to see where the authors of the article are coming from. You may not agree, but fromt their reasoning you now find yourself thinking about their statement and more open to their ideas.
The article can be found at:
http://hotjobs.yahoo.com/career-articles-interview_myths_that_keep_you_from_landing_the_job-1026
Saturday, January 9, 2010
Immigrants and the Economy
A recent study published by the Center for American Progress and the American Immigration Council claims that legalizing the unauthorized immigrants in the United States, and easing strict immigration laws, will help the economy. This claim is unacceptable to the audience initially because it contradicts what the common belief is. That belief centers around the notion that unauthorized immigrants steal jobs away from legal citizens, create a burden on the health system as well as the federal government.
This claim is made acceptable to the audience through a few different ways. The study examines three different scenarios that would affect the United States economy. The first is that deportation would result in a loss of $2.6 trillion in gross domestic product (GDP) over ten years. An assumption is used here to link the reason (loss in GDP) with the claim (legalizing the immigrants would boost the economy). The assumption is that the immigrants would be buying and consuming products here in the United States and the money that they spend would stimulate the economy while deporting them would damage it.
Another way that this claim is made acceptable is through detailing rising costs with the United States Border Patrol. Since 1992, their budget has increased 714 percent and by making the proposed changes will allow this to be reduced and allow the funds to be allocated in different ways. Statistics are used here to show that because of stricter immigration laws, more funds have to be directed to the Border Patrol while immigration continues to rise, which supports their assumed argument that the current system is ineffective.
Although the claim may still be unacceptable to many people, the researchers used logical assumptions, statistics, and long-term research to help prove how their claim is acceptable.
Article: http://www.cnn.com/2010/POLITICS/01/07/immigration.economy/index.html
Actual study: http://www.americanprogress.org/issues/2010/01/raising_the_floor.html
This claim is made acceptable to the audience through a few different ways. The study examines three different scenarios that would affect the United States economy. The first is that deportation would result in a loss of $2.6 trillion in gross domestic product (GDP) over ten years. An assumption is used here to link the reason (loss in GDP) with the claim (legalizing the immigrants would boost the economy). The assumption is that the immigrants would be buying and consuming products here in the United States and the money that they spend would stimulate the economy while deporting them would damage it.
Another way that this claim is made acceptable is through detailing rising costs with the United States Border Patrol. Since 1992, their budget has increased 714 percent and by making the proposed changes will allow this to be reduced and allow the funds to be allocated in different ways. Statistics are used here to show that because of stricter immigration laws, more funds have to be directed to the Border Patrol while immigration continues to rise, which supports their assumed argument that the current system is ineffective.
Although the claim may still be unacceptable to many people, the researchers used logical assumptions, statistics, and long-term research to help prove how their claim is acceptable.
Article: http://www.cnn.com/2010/POLITICS/01/07/immigration.economy/index.html
Actual study: http://www.americanprogress.org/issues/2010/01/raising_the_floor.html
Acai Berry Claim
Alright everyone has heard of the super fruit Acai berry. When I first saw an add for it I thought, "It is just a fruit. It isn't going to help you drop weight or miraculously cure cancer or anything like the adds said it would". The claim seemed unacceptable. I really couldn't see the benefits, but as I continued to see adds and webpages dedicated to this seemingly innocuous fruit I realized there was something that was getting everyone hooked. First the testimonials on the fruit were incredible. Oprah and every televised doctor seemed to uphold it. Next the actual nutrients attributed to the fruit, that scientists endorsed, were enough to make me even more curious. It is rich with antioxidants. Antioxidants are very good for you, so it is possible that the Acai berry could have much more going for it too. Then the fact that it is completely organic. There are no pesticides to harm the body. What could be better. Oh and don't let me forget that it will completely wash all toxins out of the body, as one of it's other claims to fame. This website I found shows what the benefits are as well as gives incredibly heartwarming testimonials http://www.amazonthunder.com/ . This claim is exactly what a good argument entails. At first the claim seems unrealistic, but when you dig deeper you come to realize that it has so much logical proof coming from all sorts of sources. It could be entirely possible that it is the superfruit it is said to be.
Obama's Healthcare Plan
An issue that is constantly being debated today is President Obama’s healthcare plan. In his youtube video “The Obama Plan in Four Minutes”, Obama explains his plan for healthcare. This video can be found at: http://www.barackobama.com/issues/healthcare/. In his video, the President makes a few claims that are aimed at convincing the American people that his plan for healthcare will be the most cost-effective and best way to ensure healthcare for everyone. One of the main claims that Obama makes is that universal healthcare will not increase taxes. This claim is initially unacceptable because providing healthcare for every American, no matter what their economic status, seems impossible without increasing taxes. Obama states that his healthcare plan will not add more money to our already substantial national debt and will make healthcare affordable to all Americans. He seems to avoid this issue by focusing his argument on how great our new healthcare system will be, without addressing the price tag. Throughout his argument, I can see the benefits of Obama’s plan, yet I am unable to tell how exactly all these new reform programs will make healthcare more affordable. Maybe I just don’t know the specifics of Obama’s plan, but it seems to me that by making healthcare cheaper for someone, it makes taxes go up for someone else. Although Obama’s claim states that healthcare will be cheaper for all, I fail to see how this could actually happen without increasing taxes at some point.
Cats feel superior to dogs
On the great website of Yahoo! they have a few "news" posts that they cycle through for the day. On such was a video of a cat ridding a Roomba (I believe they are those robot vacuum cleaners that roam around our home vacuuming so you do not have to). The caption for this video on the Yahoo! page read as such: "When it comes to dogs, some cats think they're superior — but this one thinks he's invincible."
To read the Yahoo! post go to : http://m.www.yahoo.com/?r0=1263071513
To watch the cat go to: http://video.yahoo.com/network/100284668?v=6646643&l=3774740
The claim that they are making about this video is that when it comes to dogs, some cats think they are superior.
The reason they use is that this cat is riding a Roomba and swatting a dog which apparently makes that cat feel invincible.
The complete arguement with the claim and reason is: When it comes to dogs, some cats think they are superior because this cat is riding a Roomba and swatting a dog, making him feel invincible.
The assumption they are using is: Whatever cat is riding a Roomba will make that cat think that they are superior to dogs.
The audience at first could understand that some cats do infact think that they are superior to dogs becuase of their own expereinces with observing some cats taunting acts infront of dogs. So the assumption they use could be valid to audience members if they understand that some cats act as though they are superior to dogs. However, though some of the audience my not initally accept that cats feel superior to dogs. The audience is drawn to the claim because at first it does not seem acceptable with the reason they are using to back up the claim.
Personally, I think this arguement is very weak, though it does draw the attention of viewers becuase of the unexpected video photoage. How many people have seen a cat riding a Roomba? I haven't until this moment. But just because a cat is riding a Roomba and swatting at a dog does not mean the cat feels superior to dogs. Cats do weird things just becuase they can and no one can actually figure out what the thought process is of a cat. You cannot get into a cat's head and see their thoughts. The assumption they are using is guilty of commiting the fallacy of jumping on the bandwagon (just becuase many people believe that the claim is true does not actually mean that it is true).
To read the Yahoo! post go to : http://m.www.yahoo.com/?r0=1263071513
To watch the cat go to: http://video.yahoo.com/network/100284668?v=6646643&l=3774740
The claim that they are making about this video is that when it comes to dogs, some cats think they are superior.
The reason they use is that this cat is riding a Roomba and swatting a dog which apparently makes that cat feel invincible.
The complete arguement with the claim and reason is: When it comes to dogs, some cats think they are superior because this cat is riding a Roomba and swatting a dog, making him feel invincible.
The assumption they are using is: Whatever cat is riding a Roomba will make that cat think that they are superior to dogs.
The audience at first could understand that some cats do infact think that they are superior to dogs becuase of their own expereinces with observing some cats taunting acts infront of dogs. So the assumption they use could be valid to audience members if they understand that some cats act as though they are superior to dogs. However, though some of the audience my not initally accept that cats feel superior to dogs. The audience is drawn to the claim because at first it does not seem acceptable with the reason they are using to back up the claim.
Personally, I think this arguement is very weak, though it does draw the attention of viewers becuase of the unexpected video photoage. How many people have seen a cat riding a Roomba? I haven't until this moment. But just because a cat is riding a Roomba and swatting at a dog does not mean the cat feels superior to dogs. Cats do weird things just becuase they can and no one can actually figure out what the thought process is of a cat. You cannot get into a cat's head and see their thoughts. The assumption they are using is guilty of commiting the fallacy of jumping on the bandwagon (just becuase many people believe that the claim is true does not actually mean that it is true).
Friday, January 8, 2010
The Issues.
As a member of the BYU community, I face the following issues:
1. I really don't care what your major is, but we still have to talk about it.
2. The girl at the frozen yogurt shop has BYU guys trying to pick her up all the time, and is accordingly unfriendly to me.
3. Utah kids say "filled" when they mean "field", and "melk" when they mean "milk", and "heel" when they mean "hill." Oh, and "idiz" when they mean "ideas". It shouldn't bother me, but it does.
4. The Bookstore is pretty shady, I guess. Parking is pretty tight, too. On the other hand, famine, slavery, genocide, warlordism, etc. are pretty much non-issues on campus, so that's nice.
1. I really don't care what your major is, but we still have to talk about it.
2. The girl at the frozen yogurt shop has BYU guys trying to pick her up all the time, and is accordingly unfriendly to me.
3. Utah kids say "filled" when they mean "field", and "melk" when they mean "milk", and "heel" when they mean "hill." Oh, and "idiz" when they mean "ideas". It shouldn't bother me, but it does.
4. The Bookstore is pretty shady, I guess. Parking is pretty tight, too. On the other hand, famine, slavery, genocide, warlordism, etc. are pretty much non-issues on campus, so that's nice.
Issue 1:
Parking for students is very frustrating! There seems to be 100's of "A Lots" but very few "Y Lots", and the few there "Y lots" there are, they are usually the farthest ones away!
Issue 2:
Many of the teachers are using E-text and different online web cites for there classes that seem to be more of a pain than a blessings at times! sometimes i wish the would just keep it simple!
Issue 3:
Traffic is never ending.... they seem to spend thousands of dollars and yet it never ends!
Issue 4:
In Massachusetts they allow driving down the emergency lane during traffic hours. which speeds up the flow of traffic but at the same time the issue is for those how really need to use the emergency lane and its bumper to bumper traffic.
Community Issues in S.A.
When they rebuilt the Sports Center, the seats were 2/3’s bigger than the previous size. Texas has a huge population of teenage parents. I have personally witnessed many pregnant teens while in high school. The community has an increasing amount of night clubs and bars that seem to crop up out of nowhere daily. This is increasing the chance that many more drunk accidents will occur. In the same way the drug dealing and substance abuse that goes on is increasing and seems to hit kids of younger and younger ages.
Rexburg has Issues
Issue 1: Parking
If you thought that the parking at BYU was bad BYU-I is horrible. There are extremely few designated parking lots which has caused an over flow into the public parking domains.
Issue 2: sub divisions
My home town is very small and open. How ever the recent influx of people has led to generally uncontrolled expansion. This has caused both logistical and scenic problems.
Issue 3: Public Schools
Along with an increase of the population there has been increased demand placed upon the Public school which have become increasingly overwhelmed.
Issue 4: Traffic
Rexburg was initially designed with low traffic roads that have been unable to meet the demands of the current population.
Issue 5: Snow removal
High snow levels coupled with high speed winds have led to difficult navigation across roads that are not regularly plowed Community: home town Rexburg
.
Issues in my High School
- Sex before marriage is often a debate, especially among the upper classmen. It is a debate between the religious point of view that sex before marriage is wrong, and it is their right (as long as both individuals “love” each other and are willing) to have sex with or without a condom.·
- The rising tuition cost put on the colleges in my home state, placed there by the state government has also been a huge debate. Many student s are against the extremely high rates at which the tuition costs are rising. Many feel that they will not be able to afford schooling and then will not be able to get a job which all would help increase the worsening economy predicament.·
- Gay rights is an ongoing issue. It is mainly a debate between people that have religious back grounds that believe that same sex attraction is wrong and between people that believe that anything goes, it is their right to “love” whom they want to “love.” And many gay people want everyone to accept them for who they are so that they can be open to the public about their affiliations without being scrutinized about their sexual attractions.
- The dress code continues to be another issue, especially among the females. Many believe that it is their right to wear (or the lack thereof) whatever they please. But there are others that just “don’t want to see any of that.”
“Issues” within Chino Hills, California
There seems to be a wide gap between the political/ moral standpoints of the parents and the children. This may indicate a lack of adequate communication within families.
There are occasionally children playing hooky and smoking in parking lots. Someone should intervene on their behalf, if only by talking to them.
There are still some street corners that can use a stop sign – a three second stall surely is worth the possibility of saving a life!
Neighbors, even those living next to each other, rarely visit or even interact with each other. There should be more social events for the community.
Issues in my Community
Honor code: I have heard many students complain about the Honor Code, calling it too restrictive. One thing that they fail to take into consideration is the mission and purpose of Brigham Young University. This university is not solely designed to pump out well-trained graduates; it has a higher purpose. Students at BYU are meant to be an example of the Church which sponsors this university and therefore are held to a higher standard.
Special treatment of athletes: Free clothes, private tutors for whatever class they choose, an X-Box fanatic's dream set up at a bowl game; it pays to be a collegiate level athlete. You have to wonder why athletes get so much special treatment when most of them will not play their sport after graduation.
Casual dress: I once read that a student was strongly opposed to casual dress (shorts, t-shirts, flip flops) on campus as it detracts from the learning environment. This attitude is rather juvenile as casual dress does not mean somebody is casual with their education.
Bookstore prices: Every student on campus has experienced the exorbitant prices at the Bookstore. Like me, I am sure most students feel very strongly that the policies and prices of the Bookstore are ridiculous and do not make much sense.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)